Politicians nick red Audi and actor's body from BBC
admin
Posts: 476
Joined: 2007-12-19
User is online
Politicians nick red Audi and actor's body from BBC

In what appears to be a small miracle of truly inept thievery, both the Labour party and the Conservative party have published the above Audi Quattro image on the eve of deciding the future of photographic copyright. The Digital Economy Bill proceeds to a Second Reading in the House of Commons on Tuesday 6th April. This is likely to be all the consideration it receives before getting dumped into the Wash-Up, the Parliamentary equivalent of a dodgy breakers yard.

The trouble is that either one or both political parties are highly unlikely to have obtained permission from the rights owner of the base image before grafting David Cameron's head onto the body of "Ashes to Ashes" star Philip Glenister in this BBC PR photo for the series.

Infringing copyright, if that is what they have done here, will be seized upon with rabid glee by the filesharing/Open Rights/Pirate Party fretards, as well as us lot who've known all along that Government doesn't really have a clue about photographic copyright, licensing, or what it's doing with S43. Read more about this at www.Stop43.org.uk


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
admin
Posts: 476
Joined: 2007-12-19
User is online

Meanwhile Labour have done it again!

 

Full story at www.stop43.org uk 

©A admin

admin
Posts: 476
Joined: 2007-12-19
User is online

More about this at Jeremy Nicholl's blog

The poster manages to break just about every rule in the intellectual property handbook, and with entirely predictable results. Glenister has apparently said he is unhappy about the use of his image for political purposes. Doubtless lawyers for German car maker Audi will be interested in how one of their products came to be used to promote a British political party. And BBC chiefs are reportedly “furious” at the misuse: “we would never have given permission for any political use of one of our programmes,” one senior executive is reported as saying.
Quick, define irony: the BBC, one of the main proponents of a bill to allow them to use other people’s images in ways they didn’t envisage without permission or payment, is furious that somebody has taken a BBC image and used it in a way the BBC didn’t envisage without permission or payment.

©A admin

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to images on this site using a special syntax
  • Use the special tag [adsense:format:group:channel] or [adsense:flexiblock:location] to display Google AdSense ads.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Intro · News · Analysis · FAQ · Forums · Polls · About us · Privacy · Contact · Whois lookup · Links